lecture 10 * PTA*

catholic , top of the class 13 year old teenager who got murderd on an online date car

slef awareness : expirinced self

self concept : known slef

social identitiy : self as agent

"Self begind when conscinciousness turns around in a circele "

Gallup use mirrors to operationalize self awarness

babys see another baby

18 moths + some start to be aware of their self

introspection ,contrafactual thinking ,humor ,sexual fantesy , poetry ,novels

long term planning , log term self evaluation ,moral reasoning

egotism , narciscism, self deception ,self handicapping ,shame, blame ,guilt ,worry rumination

fear of deth ,intentional evil

the amount of self awareness decreases with acohol use

N= 1,105 teenafers , 210 online relationships

troubled or high conflic / poor communication with their parents were more inclidnef to take part in close online relationahips

the narrative slef

self shemas

possible sleves / ideal self ought self

social identitiy

self beliefs clearly and confidently defines ,internally consistent and temporarlly stable

positive link with adjustment and well being

open communication with parents → increase self concept clarity 1 year later → decrease depression & anxiety 1 year later

if teenagers were able to communicate with paeents ,they reported an increase of self concept clarity , later lower derepssion

parents sepparated at age 2

mother irritable , verbally abusive

'Christina can take care of herself '

1. self complexity
2. self compartementalization

differentiation between different as self aspects

separation between positive and negative self aspects

'I dont know what to say about myself. Its difficult. Im not sure who I am. My ideas about myself change all the time. My life is not a movie.Everything is a series of snapshots. I dont know where I am in them.'

evaluative aspects of slef concepts

weak links with objective achievement

strong links with affective disorders

small but consistent drop after parental divorce

slef shown to other peole

1) continuity

2) contrast distringuish form other people

3) coherence

idenenity vs role confusion

intimicy vs isolaton

generativity vs stagnation

integration vs despair


### Social interaction

1. perosnality and selction
2. perosnality and evocation
3. persoanlity and manipulation

universally desirable : openess , extraversion , conscienciousness , agreebleness

other traits depend on match with own personlity

similarity in general ( the more similar better)

dog and individual loook the same → ( poor people tend to choose poor partener )

staying otgether longer , facial expression become more similar

1. agreebleness , emotional stability and openess
2. similarity in perosnality profiles
3. optimism

lower parter rating after 1st year

low emotional stability and low impulse control
low ES also linked to poorer recovery from break ups

uninhibited child behaviour → evokes hostility form others → hostile attribution bias child → aggresive child behaviour

Emotional instabiliy, disagreeableness, low conscientiousness

Linked to more maladaptive conflict behavior

expectancies usually grounded in reality

different traits linked to preferences for different social media

neuroticism linked to social media use

social media use may increase insecurity

1. hi Machs use exploitative social strategies
2. low Machs rely more on reciporcity
3. high Machs do best in unstructured situations

charm , coercion , slent tretment, reason

extraversion : coercion, less self absent

agreeblenes : reason, pleasure induction

conscinciousness : reason

coercion and regression

reasoning