1Define obedience.
The physiological action that links individual action to purpose. political
2assumptions of the social area
-our behaviour is influenced by our other people in our surrounding environment
- our behaviour us influenced by our social situation rather than our indiviyal characteristics
- our environment can change kur behaviour and we have little freewill to change it
3Aim of milgram study.
To investigate levels of obedience infront of an authority fiquire wheb moral consuct has been breached.
4method of milgrams study
controlled observation ( iv was not manipulated).
data was gathered via observation via researcher and one way mirror
5one key theme that links bocchiaro and milgram
responses to people in authority
6background of milgram
the holocaust and if Germans were different becUse of why they did what they did
7modern day examplea that can apply to Milgrams studyconclu
Abu Gharaib Abuse
during the Iraq qar, Abu Gharaib was detained and had to undergo physical and sexual abuse, torture, rape , sodomy and abuse.
8quantitative findings of Milgrams study
65% shocked all the way
100% shocked until 300 volts ( which is a killable amount)
9qualitative finidngs of Milgram
extreme stress e.g sweating, stuttering, trembling
3 had full blown seizures
10conclusions of milgrams study
level of obedience was unexpected, only expected 3% to survive
immoral behavior can be carried out by anyone in the prescence of an authority figuire even when moral conduct had been breached
11how was obedience measured in milgrams study
by ibserving whether participants administred electric shocks to a learner from 15 volts all the way to 450v in 15v increments
12how is demand charachteristics a weakness of milgrams study
occured in a lab at yale university where comditions were artificial and controlled .
this is a weakness because participants can change their behaviour due to the controlled environment
13how is having usenful applications a strength in Milgrams study
p’s had to administer shocks infront of an authority figuire
strength becauee it is a warning to society about potential evil and prevent similar atrocities like the holocaust
14define whistleblowing
iforming authorities about unethical practice, in particular unproffessional practice
15aim of bocchiaro’s study
to investigate how many people will comply with an unethical request
16results in bocchiaros study in the ‘what would you do?’
3.6% believed they would lie
64.5% believed they would whistkeblow
31.9% believed they would disobey
17results in bocchiaros study - main study
76.5% obeyed
9.4% whistleblowed
14.1% disobeyed
18what were the dispositional factors in bocchiaros study?
stronger the faith, the more likely to whistleblow
19conclusions in bocchiaros study
people are very obedient and whistleblowing is uncommon
20how is bocchiaros study difficult to generalise to the wider population?
undergrads from amsterdam from VU university
sample is ethnocentric and cannot be generalised to different age groupa sp it lacks population validity
21outline holw one situational factor led to high levels of obedience
they were paid to take part
increasing obligation
22why did bocchiaro carry out 8 practical studies?
to ensure rge procedure was credible as a study ob sebsory deprivation
to ensure the cover story was credible on sebsory deprivation given was morally acceptable
23similarity - milgram and bocchiaro ( same topic / obedience )
both studies are within the social psychology area and focus’ on obedience
24similarities between milgram and bocchiaro
controlled observation - no iv
overt study with a cover study
25differences between milgram and bocchiaro
milgram- orders were directly to inflict pain
bocchiaro- simoly write a message
26background of piliavin study
•the murder of kitty genovese
• she was stabbed several times whilst 38 people watched
•the man came back and killed her off
27define diffusion of responsibility
in a group , the responsibility is shared
each bystander feels less responsible
so nobody helps
28aim of piliavins study
to investigate bystander behaviour whit 4 different variables
4 variables:
•race
•size
•effect of modelling
• victims condition - ill or drunk
29sample of piliavins study
30race of sample
45% of black
55% of white
31method of piliavins study
field experiment
carried out on on a new york subway
p’s were either ill or drunk
32results of piliavins study - ill vs drunk
ill =. helped 95% of time
drunk= 50% helped
33Now can arousal be reduced
• Help directly.
• leave to find help
•leave the area
•dismiss the victim of unworthy
34why was diffusion of responsibility not found?its
participants werent allowed to leave- it was a continual 7.5 min journey from 59th to 125th street
when escape cannot occur , bystanders are face to face w victim
cost/help benefit us low because there were others helping
35how is generalisability a weakness in piliavins study
takes place on a new york sub with 4550 p’s
all from there
ethnocentric and are only generalisable to population of new york
36explain what us meant by cost benefit model
benefits- praise , feeling cood
limitations- harm, embarrasment, effort
37how was qualitative data gathered
by 1 of the 2 female observers
they recorded comments made by passengers
e.g “im not strong enough”
“its for men to help”
38defne altruism
selfless concern for wellbeing of others
394 factors in levines study
economic prosperity - taken from ppp
pace of life - time to walk 60 m
population aize- un demographic yrbook
cultural values -simpatia ir not on a scale
40participants in levines study
1198 p’s from 23 different countries
picked by the second one to cross a line
41method for levines study
cross cultural carried out in field
quasi
42conditions for levines study
dropped pen
dropped magazines w broken leg
blind person crossing road
43quantitative data from levines study
rio de janeiro- brazil = 93%
kuala lumpur-malaysia 40%
44key theme that links piliavin and levine
helping behaviour
45similarities between levine and piliavin
both investigate bystander behaviour whether people will intervene or not
p’s unaware of research
familiar natural environmebts
large sample
46differences between levine and piliavin
iv studied
fiekd or quasi
target population
47strengths of the social area
real life applications
good range of methods
48weaknesses if the social area
ethical issues
social determinism