Criminology Theories and Research Scenarios

50 flashcardsby SANGALLA
Study these flashcardsFree · spaced repetition · iPhone, Android, Mac & web

All cards

1
Scenario: Two neighborhoods have similar poverty levels, but one has substantially less violence and stronger resident cooperation. Which concept best explains the difference?
Collective efficacy, particularly shared willingness to maintain informal social control and intervene for the common good.
2
Scenario: A teenager commits offenses primarily when accompanied by delinquent peers and stops after changing friendship groups. Which theoretical mechanism is most directly supported?
Changes in differential association and social learning opportunities, although the scenario alone does not establish causation.
3
Scenario: A financially successful executive commits fraud despite having no obvious economic deprivation. Why is a simple poverty-based explanation inadequate?
Economic deprivation is not necessary for offending; opportunity, learned behavior, organizational pressures, and individual decision-making may be relevant.
4
Scenario: A person experiences repeated failures, becomes angry, and engages in aggression. Which theory specifically emphasizes negative emotions arising from strain?
Robert Agnew's general strain theory.
5
Scenario: A youth initially commits minor misconduct, receives a stigmatizing public label, and subsequently adopts a persistent deviant identity. Which process is illustrated?
Secondary deviance associated with labeling theory.
6
Scenario: A crime prevention program improves lighting but has no effect on violence occurring mainly inside private homes. What planning failure is most apparent?
The intervention did not adequately match the mechanisms and settings responsible for the targeted harm.
7
Scenario: An analyst observes that neighborhoods with high unemployment have high burglary rates and concludes that every burglar is unemployed. What reasoning error occurred?
An ecological fallacy: inferring individual characteristics from aggregate-level relationships.
8
Scenario: A researcher observes a correlation between social media use and delinquency and claims social media causes crime. What is the main methodological problem?
Correlation alone cannot establish causation because confounding variables and reverse causation may explain the association.
9
Scenario: A victimization survey identifies many incidents absent from police records. What is the strongest immediate conclusion?
Police-recorded statistics do not capture all victimization reported by survey participants.
10
Scenario: Recorded theft increases after a police station introduces easier online reporting. What alternative explanation must be considered?
Improved reporting accessibility may have increased recorded incidents without a comparable rise in actual theft.
11
Scenario: A city evaluates a prevention program using only the number of arrests. Why is this outcome measure insufficient?
Arrests reflect enforcement activity as well as offending and may not reliably measure actual crime reduction.
12
Scenario: Police deploy additional patrols to a location following an unusually high-crime month, and crime subsequently declines. What statistical phenomenon may exaggerate apparent success?
Regression to the mean.
13
Scenario: A prevention study randomly assigns eligible locations to intervention and control groups. What is the main methodological advantage?
Random assignment helps balance measured and unmeasured confounding factors, strengthening causal inference.
14
Scenario: A program has strong research support but fails because local personnel receive no training. Which implementation problem is illustrated?
Inadequate implementation capacity and fidelity.
15
Scenario: A crime intervention reduces theft but increases harassment of innocent residents. What evaluation principle applies?
Effectiveness must be assessed alongside unintended harms, fairness, proportionality, and legal compliance.
16
Scenario: An offender chooses an unattended bicycle over a secured bicycle nearby. Which theory most directly explains the immediate choice?
Rational choice theory, emphasizing perceived effort, risk, and reward.
17
Scenario: A neighborhood redesign reduces concealed entry points and improves natural visibility. Which preventive framework is illustrated?
Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design, particularly natural surveillance and access management.
18
Scenario: A person avoids offending because of close relationships, commitment to education, and acceptance of social rules. Which theory is most directly illustrated?
Travis Hirschi's social bond theory.
19
Scenario: A former offender develops a stable noncriminal identity after meaningful employment and supportive relationships. Which perspective is especially relevant?
Desistance theory, emphasizing identity change, social bonds, and constructive life opportunities.
20
Scenario: A child exposed to multiple adversities later develops delinquent behavior. Why should an examiner avoid claiming the childhood experiences made crime inevitable?
Risk factors influence probabilities rather than determining individual outcomes; protective factors and later experiences also matter.
21
Scenario: A study finds that many offenders experienced childhood trauma. Does this establish that most trauma survivors will offend?
No. The prevalence of trauma among offenders does not establish the probability of offending among all trauma survivors.
22
Scenario: A victim declines to participate in a restorative meeting because of fear of retaliation. What should take priority?
Victim safety, informed consent, and freedom from coercion; participation should not be forced.
23
Scenario: A person reports domestic abuse but initially returns to the abusive relationship. What is the most appropriate criminological interpretation?
Victim decisions may reflect complex safety, financial, emotional, family, and coercive circumstances rather than consent to abuse.
24
Scenario: A witness gives an inconsistent peripheral detail after a traumatic incident. What conclusion is scientifically justified?
The inconsistency requires careful examination but does not by itself prove deception or invalidate the entire account.
25
Scenario: A police analyst uses a victim's social background to assign blame for a robbery. What ethical error is illustrated?
Victim blaming and unsupported inference from personal characteristics to responsibility for an offender's conduct.
26
Scenario: A barangay identifies recurring youth violence and involves schools, parents, youth organizations, and social workers in prevention. What broad strategy is illustrated?
Multisectoral community-based crime prevention.
27
Scenario: An intervention provides mentoring only to adolescents with elevated risk indicators. Is it universal, selective, or indicated prevention?
Selective prevention, assuming the youths are targeted because of elevated risk rather than established early symptoms of the specific problem.
28
Scenario: An offender repeatedly commits crimes despite severe penalties because the perceived probability of apprehension is very low. Which deterrence principle is especially relevant?
The perceived certainty of punishment, which may influence behavior independently of punishment severity.
29
Scenario: A government increases maximum penalties but does not improve detection or enforcement. Why might deterrent effects be limited?
Greater statutory severity alone may have little influence when offenders perceive apprehension and punishment as unlikely.
30
Scenario: An organized criminal network continues operating after its leader is arrested. Which organizational feature may explain its survival?
Distributed roles, replacement leadership, and resilient network connections.
31
Scenario: A company systematically ignores safety regulations to reduce operating costs. Which criminological category may apply if criminal legal elements are established?
Corporate crime committed through organizational decision-making.
32
Scenario: A person transports another individual across a border for payment, while a separate actor later exploits that individual through coercion. Why must investigators distinguish the conduct?
Migrant smuggling and trafficking in persons have different legal elements and may involve different actors or overlapping offenses.
33
Scenario: A cybercrime offender deceives users into voluntarily revealing passwords. What human factor is primarily exploited?
Trust and decision-making through social engineering rather than necessarily exploiting a technical vulnerability.
34
Scenario: A city adopts an automated risk model trained on historically biased arrest records. What is a principal analytical concern?
The model may reproduce enforcement patterns and inequities rather than accurately estimate underlying criminal behavior.
35
Scenario: Police publish exact home addresses of victims in a crime map. Which competing interests must be balanced?
Public information and crime analysis objectives against privacy, safety, confidentiality, and applicable legal protections.
36
Scenario: Two countries report different imprisonment rates. Why is this insufficient to conclude that one country has more crime?
Imprisonment rates also depend on sentencing policy, enforcement, pretrial detention, sentence length, and correctional practices.
37
Scenario: A researcher compares national crime counts without adjusting for population size. What improvement is necessary?
Use appropriately defined population-based or exposure-adjusted rates while checking measurement comparability.
38
Scenario: A community reports increased fear of crime even though recorded offenses decline. What should investigators examine?
Perceived safety, highly publicized incidents, environmental conditions, trust, and differences between recorded crime and lived experience.
39
Scenario: Residents repeatedly report dangerous behavior near a transport terminal, but police focus only on arrest totals. What analytical improvement is needed?
Define the recurring problem and examine its harms, circumstances, causes, and outcomes rather than relying exclusively on enforcement counts.
40
Scenario: A prevention project reduces incidents at its target location but nearby areas also improve. What beneficial effect may be occurring?
Diffusion of crime prevention benefits.
41
Scenario: A program reduces shoplifting at one store, but incidents increase at nearby stores. What possible effect requires investigation?
Geographic displacement of offending, while accounting for unrelated changes.
42
Scenario: A researcher excludes unfavorable findings from a published crime prevention evaluation. What ethical violation is illustrated?
Selective reporting that misrepresents the evidence and undermines research integrity.
43
Scenario: Participants are told a criminological survey is anonymous, but identifiable records are retained without disclosure. What research ethics problem arises?
Misrepresentation of confidentiality or anonymity and failure to provide accurate informed consent.
44
Scenario: A study recruits incarcerated participants whose access to privileges depends on staff approval. What ethical risk requires special attention?
Undue influence or coercion that may compromise voluntary research participation.
45
Scenario: A policymaker proposes intensive surveillance of an entire religious community based only on group identity. What is the principal problem?
Unsupported discriminatory profiling that fails to establish individualized risk and may violate legal and ethical safeguards.
46
Scenario: A rehabilitation program measures success only on the day participants finish treatment. What important evaluation element is missing?
Longitudinal follow-up to assess sustained behavior, reintegration, and subsequent offending.
47
Scenario: A crime reduction strategy works in one city but produces weaker results elsewhere. Which principle explains why results may differ?
Contextual variation in institutions, population characteristics, implementation, and local crime mechanisms.
48
Scenario: An analyst discovers that a supposedly effective intervention was implemented only in neighborhoods already experiencing declining crime. What bias is likely?
Selection bias and confounding by preexisting trends.
49
Scenario: A policy reduces recorded offenses but substantially increases unnecessary detention. What should a comprehensive evaluation assess?
Crime outcomes, detention effects, individual rights, proportionality, costs, and unintended social consequences.
50
What is the most defensible approach to answering a complex CLE criminology scenario?
Identify the specific facts, distinguish theory from legal elements, select the most directly supported concept, and avoid conclusions that exceed the evidence.
Study all 50 cards for free

More Psychology & society flashcards

Module 1 - Psychology as a Science26 cardsPsychology & society · EnglishPathadox4. psychologie osobnosti 19 cardsPsychology & society · CzechTerezaTest Development15 cardsPsychology & society · EnglishAdUvertPsychology Exam 3 (Lessons)9 cardsPsychology & society · EnglishQuavoPSYC 314 Health Psychology Midterm 1260 cardsPsychology & society · EnglishTotallyLegitLife Span Development Exam 3113 cardsPsychology & society · EnglishLexieEthnographic Research Methods86 cardsPsychology & society · EnglishLLawlietBiological Psychology: Neurons and Cells71 cardsPsychology & society · Englishan OutLearn studentPsychology: Personality Traits and Erikson's Stages60 cardsPsychology & society · EnglishAdrianSociological Strain Theories and Anomie50 cardsPsychology & society · EnglishSANGALLAInklusive Pädagogik45 cardsPsychology & society · GermanMagdaDev. Psych Exam 1 Flashcards (Review Session)35 cardsPsychology & society · EnglishJacey

All Psychology & society decks

Study these decks in the app

Free on iPhone, Android, Mac and the web. Add any deck to your account in one tap.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Study all 50 cards for free