Ohr

but, however

The opposite is true

Another

After

Is it

If

If you say (the following) it makes sense
(L: if you say it's all right)

If so, if this

Or else
(L: if also)
(F: usually introduces an alternative answer or explanation)

They posed the following question
F: introduces a dilemma the Gemara will try to resolve

If you want i can say
F: introduces an alternatice answer

The other, in another

Since

It is dealing with

There is, there are

There are thise who say
F: introduces an alternative resolution or version

If you will say
(F: introduces a possibility that will be rejected)

Say

Yes

There isn't, we don't

Indeed this is so

Is it so?
(F: intoduces am attack on a previous statement)

It is mecessary, it is needed

There is

It is

He asked him
(F: introduces an attack question based on a Tannaic source)

It was taught
(F: introduces an Amoric teaching)

Still

Rather, except, but

Rather you must
(L: rather isn't it)

We see

Why

If

Why

The master said
F: introduces re-examination of a previous statement

We say

Forbidden

So too

Even though

Even though

Even, even if

We find

It lets us hear

Whether, difference

When is this said, when does this apply
(F: qualifies a previous statement)

He asked of him
(F: one Sage is asking another)

They asked of him

Ask, needs

We need

It makes sense
(F: introduces something that doesn't make sense by first mentioning the thing that does)

By

The thing itself
(F: introduces a reexamination of something stated previously in the Gemara)

Similar to

Them, theirs

Him, his

Us, ours

Perpahs

But, but in fact, this

This

The same is true
L: it is the law

There was, it is

One would have said. (F: introduces what we would have said or thought had the Gemara not made a seemingly superfluous statement)

This is

Where

How

What is the case. (L: how is it?)

here

What are we dealing with (F: clarifies a statement or introduces the description of a case scenario)

this

What is the comparision? (L: This now)

This is so (L: this also)

This makes logical sense. (F: introduces an outside source that will support an argument)

These

These words. (F: introduces a qualification of a previous statement)

It makes sense. (F: introduces something that doesn't make sense by first mentioning the thing that does)

But, in fact, behold

Now

There

Certainly, certainly

This, this one

Is liable, is obligated, is condemned

We are concerned, we suspect

Is considered

The reason

Is able, you might have thought

We derive from Torah sources

there is, there are

For example

To such an extent

everyone (L: the whole world)

that, because, when

A thing such as this, a situation such as this

In order that, just like

Since

Any, all

All the more so

No

No, isn't it

Is consistent with his resoning (L: according to his taste)

Him, to him

There isn't, there aren't

Say

Let us say this should be a refutation (F: introduces a suggested refuation)

there isn't

there isn't

The Tannaic source should have said

Why

What is it needed for? (L: why to me)

Is this to say

Really (L: forever)

Regarding the matter of

therefore

What, what is, what is it?

Why did it choose? Why did it deal with this particular case?

What practical difference is there between them?

what is the reason?

Isn't it? (F: presents a suggestion—usually rejected)

Why is it different

Who

is it any question? (L: is it needed)

What, just as

What is the law (L: what is it) (F: the Gemara is asking the ruling in a given case)

You might have said (F: introduces what we would have thought had the Mishna or Gemara not made a previous statement)

Is permissible

(Particle introducing a question) do we, who

Is it similar?

A thing, a concept

A thing similar to, a concept similar to

however

it's talking about

The matter, the thing

The Gemara asks (F: introduces an attack question based on a Tanmaic source)

Anyway, nevertheless (L: from every place)

really, actual

From where (F: Generally is asking for Torah source of a given law)

From where do we know this (F: asking for source of a given law)

Supports (F: points out that a given source or statement in the Genara supports a certain Amora's comment)

It supports him

It makes sense, its logical

from the outset

The master (F: referencing one of the sages of the Gemara)

Because, in the name of

Asks (F: introduces an attack question based on a Tannaic source)

Attacks, challenges (F: introduces an attack question based on logic)

granted ("let it be"), it is true

Its good, it makes sense

Let us say, we say

Also

went out

it is learned from (L: comes out)

The practical difference (L: comes out of it)

Chose to write (L: took)

He holds, he logically contends

He holds, he logically contends

enough

The end part (term denotes a later clause or portion of a mishna, braisa, or pasuk. Sometimes refers to the later of two clauses or several clauses)

I would have thought to say (L: it woild have gone up on my mind to say)

with

we are dealing with

exempt

They argue

Its obvious (F: an attack question on the grpunds that a previous statement is obvious and therefore redundant)

it's necessary, its needed

There is no translation for this word. It is used stylistically in Aramaic. The closest equivalent in English would be "it is" or "you are"

They argue

It lets us know, it teaches us

pasuk

It is a difficulty

Taught us in a Tannaic source

The Torah (L: the merciful one)

The beginning part, the first part

Poses a contridiction (L: throws)

We pose a contradiction (F: usually introduces a Tannaic source that seems to contradict one previously mentioned)

Is different

In case

We hear from this

Is different

Come and hear (F: introduces a Tannaic source that will support or attack the view of a given Amora)

Furthermore

An unanswerable attack, a refutation

Say

There is no definitive halachic conculsion

The Torah teaches us (L: it teaches to say)

The first Tanna

The (Tannaic) Rabbis taught (F: inteoduces a Tannaic source)

Was taught in a Braisa

Was learned in a Tannaic source

Was taught in a Mishna