1Psychological Egoism
The only thing that anyone is capable of desiring as an end in itself is their own self-interest.
2Two ways of desiring something
1) For the sake of something else
2) For it’s own sake (acquiring pleasure or avoiding pain)
3Socrates’s Thesis
We are capable of desiring justice/morality for it’s own sake
4Ring of Gyges Story
A regular man finds a ring that gives him the ability to be visable or invisable. With this he can avoid any/all consequences. When he puts the ring on he becomes power hungry and greedy, doing whatever whenever he wants. This ring exposes his true desires and motives for his actions.
5Ring of Gyges Relevance
It supports Psychological Egoism as it shows that a man's true desires and motivations are immoral and all in our own self-interests
6Glaucon's Comments
People only act justly because we are fearful of punishment.
7Instrumental Good
Something that derives its goodness from some other good thing
8Intrinsic Good
Something that is good in and of itself or in its own right
9Hedonistic Theory of Value
Pleasure is the only intrinsic good, and pain is the only intrinsic bad.
10Hedonism
The good life is the life of maximal net pleasure
11Net Pleasure
Total pleasure minus total pain
12The Profligate Lifestyle
Sex, drugs, partying, cake, beach trips -- maximum pleasure without regard for potential future pain
13The Prudent Lifestyle
Sorting through your desires and choosing which to forgo to reach maximal net pleasure.
14Will a Prudent or Profligate Lifestyle Achieve Max Net Pleasure?
Prudent
15Natural Desires
Desires that are developed naturally without social influence
16Natrual Desires can be...
Necessary for life, or health, or happiness. Not necessary for life, or health, or happiness.
17Vain Desires
Irrational desires only developed through socialization
18The Epicurean Theory of Desire
The best way to live life is by only following natural desires and eliminating all vain desires.
19Three Types of Desires
Natural + Necessary
Natrual + Unnecessary
Vain
20Death is Not Bad Argument (NB)
(NB1) It is rational for me to fear x only if x will be bad for me
(NB2) x can be good or bad for me only if I can experience it
(NB3) I cannot experience being dead
(NB4) Therefore, being dead is not good or bad for me (2, 3)
(NB5) Therefore, it is not rational for me to fear being dead. (1, 4)
21Step 1 of NB
It is rational for me to fear x only if x will be bad for me
22Step 2 of NB
X can be good or bad for me only if I can experience it
23Step 3 of NB
I cannot experience being dead
24Step 4 of NB
Therefore, being dead is not good or bad for me (2, 3)
25Step 5 of NB
Therefore, it is not rational for me to fear being dead. (1, 4)
26Defense of NB3
(3.1) I can experience something only if I exist when or after it happens
(3.2) I will not exist when I am dead
(3.3) Therefore, I will not be able to experience being dead.
27Step 1 of Defense of NB3
I can experience something only if I exist when or after it happens
28Step 2 of Defense of NB3
I will not exist when I am dead
29Step 3 of Defense of NB3
Therefore, I will not be able to experience being dead.
30Expierence Machine
A machine capable of giving you any experience or series of experiences
31Expierence Machine Argument (EM)
(EM1) If hedonism is true, then it would be good for me to plug into the experience machine.
(EM2) It would not be good for me to plug into the experience machine
(EM3) Therefore, hedonism is false.
32Step 1 of EM
If hedonism is true, then it would be good for me to plug into the experience machine.
33Step 2 of EM
It would not be good for me to plug into the experience machine
34Step 3 of EM
Therefore, hedonism is false.
35Defense of EM1
Hedonism says that the good life is the life of maximal net pleasure, and one can achieve maximal net pleasure in the experience machine
36Defense of EM2
Missing goods inside the EM: freedom, moral virtue, knowledge, love, meaning...
37Instrumental Good
Desirable for the sake of other ends
38Intrinsic Good
Desirable for its own sake
39Final Good
Desirable for its own sake, but not desirable for the sake of anything
40Three Goods from Least to Most Desirable:
Instrumental, intrinsic, final
41Moral Perfectionism
The good (eudaimonic) human life is the life of full moral virtue
42The Function Argument (FA)
(FA1) The good human life is whatever life excellently fulfills the characteristic human function
(FA2) The characteristic human function is “activity involving reason”
(FA3) Therefore, the good life is a life of excellent action involving reason (FA1, FA2)
(FA4) The life of excellent action involving reason is the life of moral virtue
(FA5) Therefore, the good life is the life of moral virtue (FA3, FA4)
43Step 1 of FA
The good human life is whatever life excellently fulfills the characteristic human function
44Step 2 of FA
The characteristic human function is “activity involving reason”
45Step 3 of FA
Therefore, the good life is a life of excellent action involving reason (FA1, FA2)
46Step 4 of FA
The life of excellent action involving reason is the life of moral virtue
47Step 5 of FA
Therefore, the good life is the life of moral virtue (FA3, FA4)
48Kind-Relativity (KR)
The good life or existence for a K is whatever life existence excellently fulfills the characteristic function of a K
*K refers to a particular human, dog, etc
49Defense of FA2
(2.1) The characteristic human function is either biological life, perceiving, or “activity involving reason.”
(2.2) Biological life is not the characteristic human function.
(2.3) Perceiving is not the characteristic human function.
(2.4) Therefore, the characteristic human function is an activity involving reason
50Step 1 of the Defense of FA2
The characteristic human function is either biological life, perceiving, or “activity involving reason.”
51Step 2 of the Defense of FA2
Biological life is not the characteristic human function.
52Step 3 of the Defense of FA2
Perceiving is not the characteristic human function.
53Step 4 of the Defense of FA2
Therefore, the characteristic human function is an activity involving reason
54Moral Virtue
A disposition or habit to have the right feelings (ex: emotions, desires), and act according to those feelings
55Doctrine of the Mean
The right feeling is a mean between the two extremes: excess and deficiency
56Mencius's Optimism about Human Nature
Humans are compassionate by nature, and regardless of where you came from you can become a moral virtue. This is evident from the story of the child about to fall into a well, and a passerby assisting.
57Four Human Emotions / Germs
Compassion / Benevolence (ren)
Shame / Dutifulness (yi)
Respect / Propriety (li)
Approval + Disapproval / Wisdom (zhi)
58Menicus on Extending Benevolence
Don’t kill the ox as I don’t want to watch it be scared like a dying man. Instead bring a lamb, outside of my view, and slaughter the lamb instead. Inconsistent. The moral thing is to notice inconsistency and take pity and spare the lamb, too.
59Moral Saint
A person whose every action is as morally good as possible. “Dominated by a commitment to improving the welfare of others.” Morally perfect.
60Loving Saint
Personal happiness lies in the happiness of others
61Rational Saint
Personal happiness does not lie in the happiness of others
62Non-Moral Virtues Examples
Skills, knowledge, interests and hobbies, or certain personality traits.
63The Moral Saints Argument
(MS1) The moral saint’s life has no non-moral virtues.
(MS2) The good life requires some non-moral virtues.
(MS3) Therefore, the life of a moral saint is not the good life.
64Step 1 of MS
The moral saint’s life has no non-moral virtues.
65Step 2 of MS
The good life requires some non-moral virtues.
66Step 3 of MS
Therefore, the life of a moral saint is not the good life.
67Defense of MS1
Morality tends to crowd out the non-moral virtues, practically (having no time for non-moral virtues due to all time spent with moral virtues), or logically (risk taking vs prudence, moral principles vs unlimited artistic freedom).
68Defense of MS2
Our real role-models have non-moral virtues.