1What is the Downsian Policy Convergence Theorem (DPCT)?
The DPCT states that when certain assumptions are met, two political parties will converge to a policy platform.
2The DPCT states that when certain assumptions are met, two political parties will converge to a policy platform.
1. Two parties, A and B.
2. Parties announce a policy platform and commit to it.
3. Equal probabilities when voters randomize between parties.
4. Voters have single-peaked preferences.
3How do parties converge in the DPCT?
Parties converge to the median voter's bliss point.
4What happens if a party deviates from the median voter's bliss point in the DPCT?#
If a party deviates, the other party can win by announcing the median voter's bliss point
5What happens if there are three or more political parties in the DPCT?
There is always an incentive to move in response to opponents' positions.

6What defines voters having intermediate preferences?
$U(p; \alpha_i) = J(p) + K(\alpha_i) H(p)$
where $K(\alpha_i)$ is monotonic and H(p) and J(p) are common to all voters
7What is a monotonic function in the context of intermediate preferences?
A function between ordered sets that preseves or reverses the given order

8How does the DPCT still apply with intermediate preferences?
Assuming sincere voting also, a Condorcet winner always exists and coincides with the bliss point of the voter with the median value $alpha_i, p(alpha_m)$
- The party’s competition leads to the median voter’s choice. Thus, political
parties select the policy $p = (p_1, p_2)$ such that
$\max_{p_1, p_2} U(p_1, p_2; \alpha_m)$
9Image occlusion: name the hidden labels
10If the assumption that $\mathbb{P}(P_A, P_B)' = 1 - \mathbb{P}(P_A, P_B) = \frac{1}{2}$, how does that change the outcome of the theory?
- There is no longer a need to have convergence btwn the two parties
- The policy implemented is still that of the median-ranked voter's bliss point
11What other preferences can be used in place of single-peaked preferences so that the MVT would still be satisfied?
Intermediate preferences and preferences with single crossing
If it's none of those then, in the case of cycling, there is not pure strategy equilibrium for the political parties (e.g Condorcet paradox)
12What do Single-peaked preferences imply in terms of utility function?
They imply the existence of a concave indirect utility function.
13Image occlusion: name the hidden labels
14Image occlusion: name the hidden labels
15Image occlusion: name the hidden labels
16Image occlusion: name the hidden labels
17Image occlusion: name the hidden labels
18Image occlusion: name the hidden labels
19Extended Median Voter Theorem: When there is direct democracy, sincere voting, and single crossing preferences...
Then a Condorcet winner always exists and coincides with the bliss point of the median voter.
Consider $p' > p_m, U(p_m;alpha_m) > U(p';alpha_m$. By definition of single-crossing preferences, for all $alpha_i > alpha_m, U(p_m;alpha_i) > U(p';alpha_i$
20Image occlusion: name the hidden labels
21Image occlusion: name the hidden labels
22Image occlusion: name the hidden labels